Regulations over how private investments can be offered into the market have been adjusted by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The author of this article examines the changes in detail. The detail here is highly specialized - we hope readers who work in the space find this information valuable.
Earlier in November US regulators simplified rules governing private investment offerings, hopefully making it easier for investors to tap into private markets without eliminating important safeguards. This change is all of a piece by moves - as seen with the Accredited Investor regime - to widen access to asset classes such as private credit, equity, real estate and infrastructure. There is debate about how much liberalization such moves really amount to. The SEC continues to adjust how the mechanics of wealth management activity works, such as in this article here.
To examine the latest situation is Debbie A Klis, partner at US-based Rimon Law. The information in this article is highly detailed, so this may be more for specialists than the general wealth management audience.
The editors of this news service are pleased to share these
insights and invite readers to jump into the conversation. The
usual editorial disclaimers apply to comments from outside
writers. Email firstname.lastname@example.org
On November 2, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission voted to amend and simplify its rules governing private-offering exemptions under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) to promote capital formation (the “Amendments”).  The SEC release included discussion of their intent to remain true to the key components of their mission, namely investor protection, capital formation and market integrity, while modernizing rules to adapt to developments in technology, marketplaces and access to capital.
The Amendments allow issuers to move from reliance on one private offering exemption to another, increase offering limits for investments covered under certain exemptions, harmonize disclosure and eligibility requirements while reducing offering costs and concerns over integration with other exemptions. The substantial majority of the amendments take effect 60 days after publication in the Federal Register; the extension of the temporary Regulation Crowdfunding provisions take effect upon publication in the Federal Register. 
Changes to Private Offering Exemptions and Investment
1. Regulation A Amendments. The Amendments increase the maximum offering amount under Tier 2 of Regulation A (colloquially known as Reg A+) from $50 million to $75 million and raise the maximum offering amount for secondary sales under Tier 2 of Regulation A from $15 million to $22.5 million. According to an SEC report, the amount of capital raised, and the number of issuances and amounts sought in Tier 1 and Tier 2 offerings, reported, as of December 31, 2019:
a. $2.446 billion raised by 183 issuers in ongoing and closed offerings (averaging $13.4 million), including $230 million in Tier 1 and $2.216 billion in Tier 2 offerings;
b. $9.095 billion sought across 382 qualified offerings (average of $23.8 million), including $759 million sought across 105 qualified Tier 1 offerings and $8.336 billion sought across 277 qualified Tier 2 offerings (excluding withdrawn offerings). 
2. Regulation Crowdfunding Amendments. Once effective, the Amendments increase the offering limit in Regulation Crowdfunding from $1.07 million to $5 million, which is substantial and perhaps long overdue for this exemption that permits non-accredited investors. According to a 2019 SEC report, between May 16, 2016 and December 31, 2018, approximately 1,351 Regulation Crowdfunding offerings occurred seeking between $94.3 million and $775.9 million.  The SEC estimates that 29 offerings reported raising at least $1.07 million from May 16, 2016 through December 31, 2018. The increased minimum amount may generate more interest in Regulation Crowdfunding.
The Amendments remove the investment limits for accredited investors, which will make this private offering exemption more consistent with other exemptions under Regulation D of the Securities Act.
Regarding non-accredited investors, the Amendments use the greater of an investor’s annual income or net worth when calculating the investment limits, which strikes a better balance between protecting these investors and allowing them greater freedom to invest. The Amendments extend for 18 months the existing temporary relief that exempts issuers from financial statement review requirements for offering $250,000 or less of securities in reliance on the exemption within a 12-month period.
The Amendments also clarify that securities offered and sold under Regulation Crowdfunding will constitute “covered securities” so that state securities law registration and qualification requirements do not apply.
3. Rule 504 of Regulation D Amendments. The Amendments raise the maximum offering amount from $5 million to $10 million for private offerings under Rule 504 of Regulation D of the Securities Act. Recall that in October 2016, the SEC adopted amendments to Rule 504 to increase the aggregate amount of securities that may be offered and sold from $1 million to $5 million and apply bad actor disqualifications to Rule 504 offerings. The main benefit of this new increase is that more small businesses will be able to rely on Rule 504, as it will now be in the consideration set for certain companies seeking funding of up to $10 million if Rule 504 makes sense for them.
4. Easing of Disclosure Under Rule 506(b) for Non-Accredited Investors. The Amendments reduce the information requirements for non-accredited investors permitted in Rule 506(b) private offerings to align them with those for Regulation A offerings. As such, issuers may use unaudited financial statements in offerings up to $20 million rather than audited financial statements, thus reducing costs considerably. The SEC hopes that reducing the costs of sales and compliance costs under Rule 506(b) may expand access to capital for some issuers. Moreover, the SEC’s data shows that a relatively small percentage of investors in offerings seeking up to $20 million under Rule 506(b) are made by non-accredited investors. 
5. Easing of Investor Verification Under Rule 506(c). The Amendments expand the Rule 506(c) accredited investor verification safe harbor to allow an issuer to treat an investor as accredited if (i) the issuer previously verified the investor within the last five years, (ii) the investor provides a written representation that the investor continues to qualify as an accredited investor, and (iii) the issuer is not aware of information to the contrary. The Amendment includes reminders to issuers that these methods are from a non-exclusive list, thus they should apply the reasonableness standard directly to the specific facts and circumstances.
The SEC believes, in some circumstances, that the “reasonable steps determination” may not be substantially different from an issuer’s development of a “reasonable belief” for Rule 506(b) purposes, such as if the issuer reasonably takes into consideration a prior substantive relationship with the investor or other facts that make apparent the accredited status of the investor. However, in contrast, such investor representation would not meet the “reasonable steps” requirement if the issuer has no other corroborating information or possesses contrary information about the investor’s status as an accredited investor.
The Amendments also reaffirm and update the following factors on which an issuer may rely for accredited-investor verification under Rule 506(c):
· The nature of the purchaser and the type of accredited
investor that the purchaser claims to be;
· The amount and type of information that the issuer has about the purchaser; and
· The nature of the offering, such as the manner in which the purchaser was solicited to participate in the offering, and the terms of the offering, such as a minimum investment amount.
6. Affirmation of Regulation S Directed Selling Efforts. The Amendments reaffirm the SEC’s position under Regulation S of the Securities Act that general solicitation by a United States issuer will not be deemed “directed selling efforts” under certain circumstances. For example, in connection with a Regulation S offering, if the general solicitation did not occur for the purpose of conditioning the United States market then directed selling efforts as part of the Regulation S offering is permitted. Recall that the availability of the issuer (Rule 903) and the resale (Rule 904) safe harbors under Regulations S have been contingent on the fact that (i) the offer or sale must be made in an offshore transaction; and (ii) no “directed selling efforts” may be made by the issuer, a distributor, any of their respective affiliates, or any person acting on their behalf. This narrowing of the definition of directed selling efforts promotes international offerings, which will not be, integrated with registered domestic offerings or domestic offerings that are conducted in compliance with any exemption.
7. Adjusting Lookback Period for Bad Actor Disqualification. The
Amendments harmonize the “bad actor” disqualification provisions
in Regulation D, Regulation A, and Regulation Crowdfunding by
adjusting the lookback requirements in Regulation A and
Regulation Crowdfunding to include the time of sale in addition
to the time of filing. The revised lookback period, which looks
to both the time of filing of the offering document and the time
of sale, will improve investor protections by further limiting
the role of “bad actors” in exempt offerings and reducing the
chance that investors may unknowingly participate in securities
offerings involving offering participants who have engaged in
fraudulent activities or violated securities or other laws or